absolutely insane,” Reeder said at the time. I got gassed several times inside the Capitol, many times outside the Capitol. “Just left the Capitol, I was one of the last people out. In one of the videos that Reeder gave the FBI, he recorded himself narrating his experience, according to a transcript included in his charging papers. Investigators have relied heavily on body camera footage from DC police officers who responded to the riots to build cases against people accused of assaulting officers, but as noted by HuffPost’s Ryan Reilly, US Capitol Police officers didn’t have that equipment. A criminal complaint against Robert Reeder includes this image of the Maryland man from video taken with his cellphone on Jan. The videos posted by Sedition Hunters didn’t appear to show him holding up his phone. 6, confirming that he went inside the building. Reeder had contacted the FBI in late January and turned over videos and photos he’d recorded in and around the Capitol on Jan.
if in fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of this Agreement.” The agreement states explicitly that the government reserves the right to prosecute Reeder in the future for “any crime of violence. It was not immediately clear if the government would consider bringing additional charges against Reeder, or if the original plea deal would stand. The judge said he was “obviously concerned” about the new development because the original evidence in Reeder’s case portrayed him as an “observer” more than a “participant.” Hogan granted the delay request and reset Reeder’s sentencing for Oct. He said he didn’t think that the new videos would change the ultimate “nature” of their defense. Reeder’s lawyer Robert Bonsib agreed with the plan to push back the sentencing date, suggesting that additional videos might ultimately help his client’s case he did not elaborate on that.
ROBERT REEDER VIDEO HOW TO
But once prosecutors learned there were more videos, Rothstein said they decided to ask for a delay to make sure they had all of the relevant evidence and enough time to go through it before figuring out how to proceed. Rothstein said the government initially planned to just revise its sentencing recommendation for Reeder from two months to six months in jail - the maximum penalty allowed for the misdemeanor count he pleaded guilty to - to reflect the more serious conduct depicted in the video. If he fails to do so, he could be charged with felony escape that would hand him a maximum sentence of up to 5 years.Appearing before US District Judge Thomas Hogan for what was supposed to be Reeder’s sentencing on Wednesday afternoon, Assistant US Attorney Josh Rothstein confirmed that the government had become aware of the new video footage earlier in the day and immediately notified the court and Reeder’s lawyer. He will also self-report to authorities to begin serving his sentence. 3 Months in Jail and $500 PenaltyĪpart from serving three months, Reeder has also been asked to pay $500 in restitution for damage done to the US Capitol. Capitol riot defendants taking misdemeanor pleas like Reeder are “not truly accepting responsibility,” said the Judge, adding that the sentence would send a signal to the other participants in that riot they would have to do prison time. But Judge Hogan decided to cut down the period so that he served three months in jail. 1drv. This gave him a maximum sentence of six months in prison. This long FBI interview of Robert Reeder, filed as part of a sentencing memo last night, is a fascinating glimpse of emotional responses, regrets & rationalizations of one J6 defendant accused of minor charges that day. The Department of Justice wasn’t ready to pursue additional assault charges against Reeder.
However, his lack of criminal record stood by Reeder. Hogan, while hearing the case on Friday, refused to condone what he saw in the video.
The videos had prompted prosecutors to call for an increase in prison life to six months, though Reeder’s attorney had argued that what he did against the police was a “reflexive, defensive action.”ĭistrict Judge Thomas F.
0 kommentar(er)
